HomeMore StoriesTrezor Data Breach Hits 67,000 More Customers, Total Tops 80,000

Trezor Data Breach Hits 67,000 More Customers, Total Tops 80,000

  • Trezor’s breach now covers more than 80,000 customers after a second disclosure.
  • The 67,000 newly exposed U.S. buyers ordered between November 2019 and August 2021.
  • ShipMonk had given Trezor written confirmation that this data no longer existed.
  • Recovery seeds and private keys were never accessible at any stage.

Trezor confirmed that roughly 67,000 additional U.S. customers had their names, emails, phone numbers, shipping addresses and order numbers exposed through fulfillment partner ShipMonk, pushing the incident past 80,000 people worldwide. These records date from orders placed between November 2019 and August 2021 – a window Trezor believed had been wiped from ShipMonk’s systems years ago, based on written assurances the logistics provider had supplied on request.

A 90-day retention policy that a supplier quietly ignored for five years

Trezor holds fulfillment data for 90 days. That policy is the entire reason the company expected its August 13 disclosure to be the final word: 13,689 customers across seven countries, all of whom had ordered within the three months preceding August 8. ShipMonk had repeatedly certified in writing that the older 2019-2021 records were gone.

They were not. Half a decade of U.S. order data sat on a vendor’s servers, invisible to the company legally responsible for it, and became available the moment that vendor was breached. Trezor’s public response singled out ShipMonk’s failure to honour a contractual deletion commitment – a rare instance of a crypto firm naming its supplier rather than absorbing the reputational cost quietly.

Disclosure Order window Affected Fields exposed
Aug 13 Phase 1 90 days to Aug 8, 2026 13,689 11,742 full record; 1,947 name, city, email
Sep 4 Phase 2 Nov 2019 – Aug 2021 (US) ~67,000 Name, email, phone, address, order number
Combined scope 80,000+ Seven countries, US majority

ShinyHunters got in through a reporting tool, not a wallet

Security researchers attribute the ShipMonk intrusion to the ShinyHunters extortion group, which exploited an unpatched SQL injection flaw in Metabase, the business intelligence software ShipMonk used internally. SQL injection tricks a database into running queries it was never meant to run; because the flaw was a zero-day, no fix existed when the attack landed. The same Metabase flaw, tracked as CVE-2026-72898 and rated 10.0 on the CVSS severity scale, also appears in reporting on the Bits of Gold breach, where the broker’s analytics platform ran its own self-hosted instance. That places two of the month’s largest crypto data leaks on one unpatched piece of software rather than on three unrelated vendor mistakes.

Trezor’s firmware, devices and seed generation were untouched, and no private key was ever within reach of the attackers. The intrusion happened several layers away from the hardware, inside the commerce plumbing that every physical product depends on.

Why a shipping address is worth more than an email dump

Anyone holding this dataset knows exactly who bought a hardware wallet, when, and where they live. That combination powers letters, calls and emails that cite a genuine order number and sound authentic enough to walk a victim toward disclosing a seed phrase.

Ledger’s customers have lived through the full arc of this. An API key vulnerability in 2020 exposed roughly 1 million email addresses and about 272,000 records containing full name, postal address and phone number, and once the file circulated on hacking forums, victims received fraudulent support calls and physical mail containing counterfeit replacement devices carrying seed-extraction malware. Trezor buyers now sit on the same starting line.

Three vendor failures in a single August

CertiK counted 52 verified wrench attacks in the first half of 2026, up 33% from 39 a year earlier, with home invasion overtaking kidnapping as the dominant method and recorded exposure reaching $124.1 million. A leaked shipping address is the input that attack pattern runs on. None of these breaches involved firmware or cryptography. Attackers unable to defeat a secure element are instead buying the customer list from whoever mails the box.

Anonymous delivery is the fix Trezor is now building

Trezor has emailed affected customers directly from its official help address on the trezor.io domain, and says it is developing an anonymous delivery option that strips personal data from the shipment record itself. That shifts the defensive line: instead of trusting suppliers to delete data on schedule, the aim is to never hand it over. Whether competitors follow, and whether logistics providers can operate on minimal identifying data at scale, will determine if this remains a Trezor feature or becomes the industry’s default.

Disclaimer: ETHNews does not endorse and is not responsible for or liable for any content, accuracy, quality, advertising, products, or other materials on this page. Readers should do their own research before taking any actions related to cryptocurrencies. ETHNews is not responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods, or services mentioned.
Alexander Stefanov
Alexander Stefanov
Alex is a financial markets journalist and co-founder of Millennial Media Group, with nearly a decade of writing about how money actually moves. He came in through Bitcoin in 2016, but what hooked him wasn't the price — it was the questions underneath it. Who sets the rules of a currency no government controls? Why do markets panic and euphoria arrive on schedule? Chasing those answers turned into a career: first mapping how crypto works from the inside, then following the same instincts into equities, commodities, and the macro forces that quietly steer all of it. He treats the two worlds as one story, because in practice they are. His problem with most market coverage is that it explains nothing. A headline tells you the price moved; it rarely tells you why, and the "why" is the only part worth a reader's time. So that's what he writes toward — the mechanism, the incentive, the second-order effect most people miss until it's already priced in. He holds a degree in Tourism from New Bulgarian University, which taught him more about human behavior under uncertainty than any finance program might have. Over 200 in-depth analyses and more than 10,000 articles later, he's still convinced the market has something new to teach him every single day.
RELATED ARTICLES

LATEST ARTICLES